Archive for the 'Property Maintenance' Category

Chicken or Egg?

Just for fun or is it clear from the Customer's viewpoint

For many years, software companies have worked around the premise that their software induces “services revenue”. 

We might observe that the Services component of any solution is derived through discussing the Customer’s business problems.  Thus, we might see this as a chicken or egg problem, Software is a chicken and Services are the egg. 

Customers are quite clear that their business problem comes first…find them a solution and they could care less what the software is called…it will do “stuff” and configuration and training will be required.

Extrapolating the chicken and egg idea (for the fun of it), we might look at what we feed the chicken and how we keep it safe with fox-proof fencing…otherwise, no more chickens, no more eggs.  The Solution must be compatible with the Customer’s IT Infrastructure, resilient and future proofed.  It probably needs to integrate with the Customer’s core systems to provide an effective solution and not merely solve one small part of the problem.

Customers often seek solutions from existing suppliers, with whom they have built a relationship of trust over many years and several projects.  Companies like ORACLE led the way setting up their Education division when they noticed that is was often the case that a Customer already owned the software to solve their business problem, but lacked the “know-how”.  What could delight a Customer more than the opening statement “Actually, you already own this software,” followed by “we just need to configure it, do a bit of integration and train the users…”

In the case of software that is already owned, is this the equivalent of incubating the eggs properly?  And can we draw a parallel between integration with external systems and good exercise we offer free range chickens…?

As I said, just for the fun of it…

  • Business Problem = Egg
  • Software = Chicken
  • Environment = Installation
  • Tomorrow’s Environment = Incremental development and support
  • Feed = Consultancy
  • Incubating eggs = User Training
  • Integration = Free Range living
  • Fox-Proof fencing = Project Management

…and I still cannot answer the question, except to say that from a Customer’s point of view, the problem comes first.

Scottish user group

Haha

Confirm helps Councils to implement THEIR policies by offering configurability

I was at our Scottish User Group on Wednesday and WOW, some of the presentations by users to users just blew me away.  The quality of presentation, attention to detail and determination to provide modern and efficient public services through Confirm amazed and delighted me.

It was one of those moments where the aspirations of a small group of people in 1991 echoed in the back of my mind as Confirm users showed how the underlying architecture of Confirm enabled modern services to be configured without coming back to the software provider for services or more modules. 

Re-usable functionality and re-usable training were employed in a demonstration about Graffiti removal – the only controversial thing was the graffiti itself…not repeated here!  Real issues were tackled (like the graffiti artist replacing their work, only hours after it had been removed) and the solution employed the use of “Before and After” photos linked to the data record as well as being “uploaded” to the Corporate CRM.

And this was just one of the many things that delighted me.

I heard a Bridge Engineer explain to me how they were storing Monuments in Confirm as his team were well equipped to understand Public Works of Art as Structural Engineers, and deal with the Public Safety and Engineering Integrity aspects of the pieces through Confirm.

Art or Crime

Is any form of Graffiti art or crime? Regardless, modern public services can help and Confirm can be configured according to YOUR views

A sunny day in Scotland where the users of Confirm far exceed our design aspirations, “admiration” for the continued dedication of public sector workers to high quality service provision and pride that our software played some small part in helping them.  Good day, that one.

Of course, it left me wondering about graffiti on Public Art and I smiled as I tried to work out if there was a new wordplay somewhere in there….If the old question was “is Graffiti art or vandalism?”, then what about Graffiti on Public Art?

20 years of mobile application development

 

Mobile working for Municipal workers started life with heavy duty Mobile PCs

Mobile working in the 1990's

20 years of mobile application development, by John Gomersall, 28 October 2010

I remember being so impressed when I first saw the Husky Hunter 16 and what we were doing with it to support mobile inspection of Trees back in 1991.  It was a DOS based box and we used to write our code on it using Dataflex, which was the same 4GL we used to use for our host application (who says cross-platform development is new).  Synchronisation was via a memory module that plugged into the serial port, but even so the users loved it because overall it saved them time when doing their job.

I have less fond memories of the “Touch PC” which we tried to port our application to back in 1997.  It was the size and weight of a small brick and I we tried to out-source the development to a third party.  A prime example of why waterfall doesn’t work, we told the company what to do rather than giving them empathy for what the customer needed to achieve.  I don’t think we ever sold any of those…L

Mobile working started to evolve

Mobile working with advanced text based field computers

We had a more successful result with outsourcing when we ported to the Psion Workabout soon afterwards.  We put a lot of work into specifying the requirements in terms of user tasks, rather than strict screen design.  What we were finding was that each device has its own style of user interface and you need to adapt to fit with that, rather than forcing a square peg into a round hole.

My first experiences with mobile GIS were with a company called PenMetrics.  They had a product called FieldNotes which provided a forms engine built around mobile mapping.  We used to run it on Compaq Tablets running Windows 95 for Pen Computing.  One of the main issues there was that it was really easy to get a simple form up and running to capture data, but it was virtually impossible to create a workflow around a task that originated in the back office, e.g. investigate a complaint about a pothole…  This was my first big lesson on the need to build the solution around the workflow and not get too overwhelmed with the cool and groovy map in the centre of everything.

Mobile computing started to become popular as Windows was introduced

Mobile computing on the PocketPC: Windows was introduced

We had a lot more success when we started to use MapInfo as our mapping engine, which we controlled via DDE from the main application.  This gave us a lot more control, but was still pretty clunky from a user-experience point of view.

When Windows CE came out around 1999 and subsequently the PocketPC platform we were really excited and I remember thinking “this is it, finally a platform and form factor that will have some longevity”.  We were finally able to fully embed the map into the application using MapX Mobile, and apart from a couple of major re-write’s moving from C++ to eVB to C# the software has lasted up to the present day.

New style mobile computing

Mobile computing hits the masses with i-Phone and Android

What has changed, however, is the process we follow to develop the software.  Adopting a combination user centred design and agile practices has been essential in minimising the time to value for our customers.  We now get the developers and customers together on a regular basis on “Customer Advisor Panels”, to work through and prioritise requirements.  At these sessions, which occur every 2 or 3 sprints, we are able to demonstrate production quality software that customers can take away and start using once their minimum threshold of capability has been reached.

 Looking forward I’m really excited about HTML5 as a platform for building truly cross-platform mobile applications whilst providing a rich UI that is specifically tuned to the device.  Watch this space…

7.1% for the next four years

That’s about the size of it: 7.1% cuts for each of the next four years. 

GO George GO? How do you feel? Encouragement for him or advice...after today's CSR

George Osbourne announced how Public Spending will change in his CSR review this afternoon and Local Government cam off particularly badly. 

What will be different in each Local Council will be how the cuts will be implemented to achieve these numbers.  Being at SOLACE last week, I noticed CEOs were busy networking; some trying to collaborate with adjacent Councils, some discussing ideas or nurturing proposals founded in prior conversations.

I guess that staff on the front line will get to know about their Council’s “Vision”, “Strategy” and the specific activities that work towards these cuts in due course.  Meanwhile, here are a few ideas being tossed around, recounted in true Chatham House Rules fashion:

1. My Highways Department can be outsourced – we simply name the amount the Service provider can spend in each of the next four years.

2. My Highways Department can collaborate with adjacent Highways Departments

3. We are sharing Senior Management and front line services will be protected

4. Mobile working will help us merge several departments into one large Street Scene and Asset Management Department (like they do in Australia)

5. Combine IT systems whilst forcing through the realisation of IT savings (do not accept the IT charge for each department is a fixed price “conversation”)

6. Put IT systems into the cloud and transfer CAPEX to OPEX

7. Don’t buy any IT systems until you have checked if an existing system will “do for now”.

8. Based on proposed reduction in staff numbers, we need to work out beforehand how to deliver services (harsh but certainly being talked about)

9. Core services only (a Mantra of not just a few!)

Love to hear any comments, feedback or what your Authority is planning.  (BTW – have you noticed that the Chancellor’s initials are GO – is this encouragement or advice  :¬) )

In the absence of knowledge, create rumours

A series of small cuts in each of the next four years

A series of small cuts in each of the next four years

Cuts are coming.  Chief Execs have made high level plans to cut 25% in real terms over the next four years of this parliament. 

Few, if any, of the plans will have details of exactly how they will be executed.  Everyone is awaiting the autumn announcement and most countries around the world will be doing the same thing.  Without knowledge of how cuts will be implemented, rumours have started. In response, some have taken action whilst others are in denial or ignoring rumours.

Amongst the rumours and actions, are groups of people whose actions are based on the belief that 25% immediate cuts are being asked for.  So, lets look at the maths.  Most plans are  based 2011/12 being the same cash amount for their Local Authority as this year – hence a small decrease in real terms.  That leaves 3 more years to achieve a 25% reduction.

Create your own rumour.  The same is happening throughout the world.

Create your own rumour. The same is happening throughout the world.

Simple maths shows that it is necessary to make between 5.5% and 6.75% cuts in each of the next three years after 2011/12, if inflation is between 2% and 3%. 

That doen’t sound quite so bad, but certain services will be ring fenced, needing increased funding in line with inflation whilst others will be judged “non-core” and be asked to work with huge cuts or become optional.  Who knows what we will pay to get into the Swimming Baths in future and do we really believe that potholes will be fixed so quickly and efficiently as they are today?

And what about compliance with legislation?  What about new or changed Codes of Practice?  What about Citizen increased expectations and those adverts on TV about “if it wasn’t your fault you may be entitled to compensation: no fee”.

My rumour is that we will evolve into the new state: lower services in some respects and possibly some services and jobs transferred to the Private sector.  But the big point is that people will get creative and achieve these cuts using peer level collaborations of the most ingenious sort.

iPhones and ice-creams

In a recession, people still buy iPhones and ice-creams, it is said.What is essential, nice enough that you feel it essential or that is so outstandingly better than its predecessors that you would spend money on it when money is really tight?

People buy ice creams because it is hot, they love ice creams and they decide they are happy to spend that amount of money because it will cool them down or just because they deserve it.

iPhones are really expensive, but people with very little money buy them.  Why did my son buy one when he left university and walked straight into a job…because the package allowed him to spend less than he did with pay as you go, because it has lots of extra stuff that he would use (often) and, frankly, it is as essential for a young Doctor as a Morgan Sports Car was in the 1970′s.

So, value, added value and desirability are reasons to purchase high value items.

I think of our Confirm system like the iPhone – somewhat ahead of its time when it was released, with loads of “added value” over its competition and adding loads of extra features and functionality that our users will value and use – often.

The relentless march forward of Confirm, adding more and more value each year means that we cannot take a break for ice-creamsWe are soon to release the Street Works Events and Diversions module and are working on other new modules (steered by our developers talking directly with our users in small groups) and the work being done to add value to our Confirm Mobile software is too good to mention on the Blog…bit like a new flavour of ice-cream…we will announce it when it is released so that the competition does not copy it!

As relentless as Nadal at the French open, Confirm continues to add value to ensure that it stays in the “iPhones and ice-creams” bracket of tomorrow. 

We look forward to a Hot Summer with hot stuff coming out from PBBI.

Seventh Heaven: Maintain services standards with greatly reduced costs

I have been looking at what might afford the best chance of actually reducing costs to UK Local Authorities in that period of austerity we expect post-election.  Some might even “have a go” pre-election if they can use existing IT Investments; therein lies my first idea:

Make most use of the systems you already own.  Confirm covers ten “departments” but not one of our Customers uses it in all ten.  Quite a few use it in 6, 7 or 8 and less than a handful use it in only one.  So extending it to other departments might cost nothing and offer the chance to stop paying support on those other systems.  It is quite high up on most IT Directors’ lists – reduce the total number of IT systems and if, like Confirm, there are great Corporate System Interfaces already in place, then hidden savings occur and need to be counted in reporting total savings!  (2 for the price of one?)

My second idea is about the need to comply with Legislation and Code of Practice whilst meeting service standards (and sometime to help the avoidance of incorrect or spurious liability claims).  In addition to meeting these requirements, Councils need to be sure that they can continue to meet ever-changing codes and laws.  Looking for hard evidence of this capability, of standing mechanisms that will not go away and are supported by staff structures that are sustainable.

As rare as Hens' teeth, perhaps as valuable as Gold teeth?

As rare as Hens' teeth, perhaps as valuable as Gold teeth?

My third is all about data.  Rubbish data is often the start point of a project to implement a new system, sometimes from disparate legacy systems and the cleansing and rationalisation of such data is essential…but who has the tools and the time.  Horizontal systems and Council staff with the expertise to use then are as rare as Hens’ teeth so can the supplier come up with the goods, experts and desire?  Look for evidence, see demos, ask reference sites.  The capability is as valuable as Gold teeth, especially if it is coupled with mechanisms to deal with ongoing asset data that is refreshed at intervals and asset data that starts off incomplete.

My fourth idea is about user democracy: What mechanisms exsit to get user ideas for software enhancements into the software.  A system will prevail over many years where user democracy is high more often than where it is “low to non-existent”.

The fifth idea is about software for mobile  workers that maps onto their role and the data needs within the host system workflows.  This is something that I have written about at length so I will not write more about it here save to say that Mobile hardware with a generic “something” (GIS or form based tool) is poor compared to specifically designed software that is Mobile Mapping enabled, capable of taking or showing linked photographs and files, that is GIS enabled, is tailored to the role requirement AND finally is linked to workflows/rules within the system that it is sending data to!

Seven ideas for a reducing the cost of a well maintained Street Scene

Seven ideas for a reducing the cost of a well maintained Street Scene

My next, the sixth, is about linking with Corporate systems, whether frontline or back-office.  Links should be using industry standard methods and standards so that the supply-side cannot hold its customers to ransom now or at any point in the future.  They should also add value by reducing cost, as well as paying their cost back within 18 months.  (Interfaces can be expensive, so this is a great acid test!)

Finally, my seventh is all about Citizen portals that perform any of the tasks relevant.  Citizens may have to report service requests, asset defects, incidents or they may wish to see how services are delivered or enquire after standards of service delivery achieved.

In my 20 years working with Confirm, if all seven are met or even if most are met, money is saved in huge amounts and from many aspects.  The principles are sound and part of a successful project.  There are other parts such as people management and “staff with talent”, but I am not so sure I can help there.

Invisible but efficient, please

Maintenance of Municipal assets is important: sometimes for function and sometimes for beauty

Maintenance of Municipal assets is important: sometimes for function and sometimes for beauty

Street based roads and municipal services don’t just happen, but Citizens want that to be the case.

My time working for a London Borough taught me that Citizens are quick to take great services for granted and to criticise – often “generously”.  The fact is that we do want clean streets but do not want to see people cleaning them, we do want great road surfaces but don’t want delays from roadworks and we do want green spaces to be beautiful but do not want grass cutting machines spoiling our Sunday stroll or child’s football match.

What do you remember about that remarkable place?  Was it the lack of litter, the smooth roads, the pavements that you could roller blade along, the cycle lanes off of the roadway?  I doubt it!  The things we remember are the good times, the pictures we take, the meals we had and it all comes across that invisible efficient Municipal background.

We would all be quick to criticise, but when did we last send a leeter complimenting our local council for things we did not notice?

We would all be quick to criticise, but when did we last send a letter complimenting our local council for things we did not notice?

With my job, I do notice municipal efficiency wherever it happens, but I also notice that others do not notice.  So every day I turn up with unswerving confidence for the importance of what I do – help Government departments provide that efficient and invisible service that creates experiences, memories and a street scene vista that is only treasured when it is no longer there.

I get confidence knowing that Confirm does for this critical part of our lives what Marks & Spencer did when they connected the Suppliers with their computer system, and the computer system with the shopper.  Nowadays, in all retail outlets, a dress is purchased and the stock holding is updated and the supplier receives a controlled order for another one.  In every Confirm user Government department or Municipal department, a citizen notices a pothole, reports it and a repair is ordered, the ticket is electronically issued over the airwaves and the team that has to fix it can make safe the existing low impact task and go straight to thathigh impact event or pothole so that they are, indeed, efficient and mainly invisible.  An inspector can take the post works inspection in their stride, without even returning to the office and reports go to the major stakeholders without anyone “pressing a key”.

Connecting the Stakeholders in the value chain was the largest leap ever made with software for Street Services and Mobile software is the most sought-after element of any operational system in any department.  IBM seem to be creating the ideal advertising campaign for Confirm – smarter cities indeed!

Jyvaskyla: an example of invisible efficiency.  There are many in the UK such as Derbyshire, Liverpool, Moray and many, many more.

Jyvaskyla: an example of invisible efficiency. There are many in the UK such as Derbyshire, Liverpool, Moray and many, many more.

So, on a recent trip (it happened to be Jyvaskyla in Finland), I noticed the municipal workers come out the morning after heavy rain to clear up, unlike the rest of my family.  We all noticed the sculptures in the parks of the “City of Light”, along with the people skating because there was no snow and the old people using ski-poles to help them walk.  Only I noticed that the pavements were spectacular as I cycled around with my youngest son, yet I never noticed anyone fixing a pothole.  Then, on a visit soon after to Derbyshire, I noticed another wonderful place, this time managed by Confirm.  During my business trip to Matlock in Derbyshire, I wondered how many families just like mine went home with similar memories of a great place in our country and just how many wonderful places there are in the UK.  Moray, West Lothian, Liverpool, Haringey, the Public Housing green spaces in Northern Ireland and hundreds more.

Making an invisible but efficient difference to peoples’ lives, all day, every day, Confirm Software.  Where’s beautiful in the UK?  Answers by email to dominic.mcneillis@pb.com

Your place or mine?

The topic of where software resides is creating a new choice: “your place or mine”.

Software has mainly been installed on a Customer’s own IT Infrastructure and I will refer to this as “on-premise”.  A new choice is emerging where software is available to use from a Supplier’s IT infrastructure and I will refer to this as “on-demand”, a term covering many options including “SaaS” (Software as a Service), “Hosted” and “over-the-net-in-a-browser”.
A question worth addressing at any time or just when your system is up for replacement?

A question worth addressing at any time or just when your system is up for replacement?

With the on-demand option, vendors might use phrases such as “there is no software, it is a service” and “you need to think differently, because there is no software any more”.  I think that there is, indeed, software; it is just provided in a more cost efficient model and licenced to you via a different style of contract.

Technicalities aside, what are the key issues that potential purchasers should think about if SaaS or on-demand is offered?  There are four groups of questions that must be considered and a few that might be considered:

  1. Suitability
  2. Absolute cost
  3. Availability
  4. Security

SUITABILITY

  • Don’t be distracted by the choice of on-demnd or on-premise UNTIL you have established that the software meets your business needs

ABSOLUTE COST

  • Compare all costs over a number of years
  • Look at the internal costs you might now NOT have to pay, which might include costs of IT support staff, hardware; IT departmental charges; third party software; version upgrade costs (can be up to £30k+ per year in many organisations using FM suppliers instead of in-house IT staff); reduced System administrator costs (as you no longer have 100 PCs to upgrade) and many more
  • Look at any hidden costs, such as a Departmental charge NOT reducing because of internal “rules” and extra interfacing costs
  • Include the commissioning costs if this is relevant (possibly low if an existing supplier is swapping the delivery method from on-premise to on-demand)

AVAILABILITY

  • How resilient is the proposition in terms of speed of access (e.g. when all staff are looking at the weather at 1pm on-line)
  • How is the data backed up, how often and where are backup stored?
  • How are local Maps, Local Printing and Local Corporate system interface dealt with?
  • Can people work from home, with their own variety of access bandwidths?
  • Does the Infrastructure supplier have one or many sites, where are they and how are significant incidents (floods, bombs etc) going to affect your system?
  • Will the Infrastructure supplier go bust (if this happens, you will not expect it, so best ask) and what happens that day to your system
  • How do Home workers access the system from home PCs – or is it best that this is a big NO
  • How would Field Workers upload and download data to mobile devices and what about the ones who need to do so wirelessly
  • and so on…

SECURITY

  • Where is the data stored?
  • Can ex-employees with a grudge trash the data?
  • It may matter to your organisation where the data is stored.  Find out.
  • What are the points at which the data is in the public domain, if any?
If you choose "On-Demand", choose it.

If you choose "On-Demand", choose it.

Naturally, the list of questions could go on a long time.  If I was a purchaser, being offered on-demand and on-premise, here is how I might think:

> Let’s make sure that I have evaluated this software as my best option BEFORE addressing my attention to this question (an old sales trick when getting no commitment to buy is to offer an alternative question that is a version of “so, if you did choose to buy it…which I know you have not yet done…, would you choose red or green?”)

> If this is my chosen software, then, is it cheaper to have on-demand over 1, 5 and 10 years for ME taking MY organisation’s way of counting costs to ME in MY role in MY department (if not stop right now)

> Now I am considering on-demand, how available is it compared to on-premise and what is the evidence to support that (or ask for I will insist on a trial of sorts)

> Now that I am considering on-demand and I know it is as available as on-premise (or better than on-premise), how will it interface to the systems and devices that are part of my requirement

> Now that I am OK with it technically, what data security rules should I consider and what evidence do I need (this one is pretty straightforward)

> How will the supplier develop the software’s capabilities for my vertical solution compared to how best of breed on-premise solutions are developed and what is the evidence? (I need proof that this makes financial sense to my supplier or they will either fail to develop the system as my needs change over time or go out of business)

With so many people offering on-demand as an alternative to on-premise, the need for a mutually beneficial relationship remains as does the need for me to be offered the choice: your place or mine!

Do you manage assets or provide services?

Millau Bridge, Tarn Valley, Southern France

Millau Bridge, Tarn Valley, Southern France

Employees in Local, Regional and Central Government Agencies, their partners and a plethora of stakeholders turn up for work each day and do their part in the “Value Chain” of Public Infrastructure Maintenance.  Some inspect assets, others make difficult decisions about expenditure based on limited funds and resources.  Yet others are skilled tradespeople and craftspeople who actually do the jobs that repair, install or decommission assets.

Are these people experts in Maintenance Management?  Are the assets themselves actually important?  Or is the Service the thing of importance?

Looking at Refuse collection services, the publicly owned refuse bin is not that which one normally focuses on as an employee in a Municipal Cleansing and Waste work group; the service is what draws delivery staff attention – is it timely, effective, cost effective?

When we look at other assets, we might be drawn to other conclusions.  A Bridge Engineer will definitely focus their working efforts on the Condition of components of a Bridge in the context of failure of the whole Asset.  With catastrophic consequences, Bridge failure is the correct focus yet one may ask if all it does is provides a service, as part of a Highway…whose function is to facilitate the efficient movement of citizens between various buildings.  Some Bridges are destinations, with intrinsic beauty and statuesque appeal such as the Millau Bridge in Southern France or the Fehman Belt Bridge in the Baltic Sea.

Even beautiful assets have function, the ambition of the designer or commissioning body had the vision to make something with intrinsic beauty, adding a secondary function of making a statement about that part of the world, turning “it” into a destination or, more likely, providing function within the context of a beautiful area. 

...you affect the lives of citizens in a profound way

...you affect the lives of citizens in a profound way

Back to the people…Assets are key to providing services?  Perhaps.  If so, consider the process of maintaining the road.  It needs to be available in perpetuity, in the best condition that supports the transport requirements of the day and unavailable for the least amount of time.  People have developed science to predict the best time to do the least amount of work to keep the road available and this science can be flexed for differing budgets and differing desired road conditions (Pavement Management).  The people who carry out this “science” are called Pavement Engineers and they care about the asset; their managers and policy makers care about the service.  In consultation with “Government” about Public funds and sometimes with citizens (in a democracy) about desired quality, they set out the rules and parameters for the Engineers to conduct their Asset Maintenance Science.

Now to the staff involved in “event driven maintenance”.  There are many aspects of Street Based Asset Maintenance in which Events drive most of the remedial actions.  Examples include Graffiti removal, many types of property repair, Street Lamp replacements, clearing fly tipping, providing a Bulky Household collection, clearing a fallen tree…none of which would ever happen without their event…amusing thought, perhaps, clearing a fallen tree that isn’t there yet?  “Event Driven Maintenance” could be a topic in a University course and, indeed, tomes have been written about this aspect of Infrastructure Maintenance, but it is really all about providing a service to citizens so that they enjoy a great built environment.

Manage assets or provide services?  The TEAM has a profound effect on the lives of its citizens.

Manage assets or provide services? The TEAM has a profound effect on the lives of its citizens.

I went to one of the big Business Analyst firms the other day and the Director of Public Infrastructure and I mused about how most citizens hardly notice the well maintained Public assets that ARE Britain, or New Zealand, or Melbourne and so on.  Citizens visit other parts of the world and notice that Refuse in (perhaps) The Gambia is collected every month, when a large truck goes along the main streets and most refuse on the street is collected and thrown into the back of large trucks by intimidating crews; children are kept away and cars are parked off of the route whilst domestic refuse and unwanted items are put out into the now empty street.  You would not be asking for the Bin to be a different shape, which colour should be used for recyclables or whether it had an ID chip but you might be asking for weekly collections as a start point! 

So we are focused back on the service. 

My conclusions is that TEAMS provide services to citizens.  Within the team, Engineers and Scientists practise aspects of the appropriate Asset Maintenance Management techniques. Others within the team make decisions levels of service to balance public funds with citizen demands.

On a purely personal note, I observe that those involved in all aspects of Managing public assets and providing public services affect our lives much more than we usually think about…until we are confronted with very different levels of service or public assets that are clearly in a very different condition.  Oh, and by the way, the public would like to hardly notice your 24/7/365 efforts, but want to feel really good about where they live.

To answer my own question “Do you manage assets or provide services?”, I choose an answer with an added observation: Your team does both and, in so doing, you have a profound effect on all of the citizens you serve.