Archive for the 'Confirm v10' Category

TTV, ROI and Cost

The way I read Government spending patterns changing, post austerity measures and in every Country, is that there are 3 tests, ALL of which will need to be passed for Government Organisations to make purchasing decisions.

The first is newly important – Time To Value or TTV.  Of course this has 2 tests itself – empirical and comparative: empirical in the sense that it has to suit the project or business need driving the purchase and comparative in the sense that it needs to be the best compared to alternatives.  With regards to software, I have seen examples of decisions where applications are selected on the basis of TTV simply because organisations do not have sufficient staff for the old-style large projects.  We have seen literally hundreds of wins for MapInfo Pro v10.5 against its more complex competition where TTV is a significant factor and not only in Government procurements.  Of course, our Asset Management and Maintenance Management solution wins out over its competition with wonderful recent examples of projects in 2 major UK Counties.

Asset Maintenance Management picture

Through The Viewfinder is what TTV used to be best known as.

ROI has been much talked about and does not need more said here. 

Finally, cost is a critical factor.  As Dave Clark, DG of SOLACE said when addressing a group of PBBI colleagues a few weeks ago, “Don’t come along asking me to spend lots of money and citing a really good ROI, if I simply don’t have the money…”. He went on to emphasize that, with Government cuts, suppliers must stop thinking in old ways and think the way that Local Government Chief Executives think right now.  If suppliers help Government Organisations to reduce spending, better than any competitor and with a rapid TTV…the ROI will be there – why wouldn’t it be?

If TTV and all 3 tests is the way to evolve, Confirm has a great set of recent proof points and we will soon be pubishing Customer comments about the newly released version 10.  TTV is no longer “Through The Viewfinder”, it’s a mandatory purchaser’s test that must be passed.

20 years of mobile application development

 

Mobile working for Municipal workers started life with heavy duty Mobile PCs

Mobile working in the 1990's

20 years of mobile application development, by John Gomersall, 28 October 2010

I remember being so impressed when I first saw the Husky Hunter 16 and what we were doing with it to support mobile inspection of Trees back in 1991.  It was a DOS based box and we used to write our code on it using Dataflex, which was the same 4GL we used to use for our host application (who says cross-platform development is new).  Synchronisation was via a memory module that plugged into the serial port, but even so the users loved it because overall it saved them time when doing their job.

I have less fond memories of the “Touch PC” which we tried to port our application to back in 1997.  It was the size and weight of a small brick and I we tried to out-source the development to a third party.  A prime example of why waterfall doesn’t work, we told the company what to do rather than giving them empathy for what the customer needed to achieve.  I don’t think we ever sold any of those…L

Mobile working started to evolve

Mobile working with advanced text based field computers

We had a more successful result with outsourcing when we ported to the Psion Workabout soon afterwards.  We put a lot of work into specifying the requirements in terms of user tasks, rather than strict screen design.  What we were finding was that each device has its own style of user interface and you need to adapt to fit with that, rather than forcing a square peg into a round hole.

My first experiences with mobile GIS were with a company called PenMetrics.  They had a product called FieldNotes which provided a forms engine built around mobile mapping.  We used to run it on Compaq Tablets running Windows 95 for Pen Computing.  One of the main issues there was that it was really easy to get a simple form up and running to capture data, but it was virtually impossible to create a workflow around a task that originated in the back office, e.g. investigate a complaint about a pothole…  This was my first big lesson on the need to build the solution around the workflow and not get too overwhelmed with the cool and groovy map in the centre of everything.

Mobile computing started to become popular as Windows was introduced

Mobile computing on the PocketPC: Windows was introduced

We had a lot more success when we started to use MapInfo as our mapping engine, which we controlled via DDE from the main application.  This gave us a lot more control, but was still pretty clunky from a user-experience point of view.

When Windows CE came out around 1999 and subsequently the PocketPC platform we were really excited and I remember thinking “this is it, finally a platform and form factor that will have some longevity”.  We were finally able to fully embed the map into the application using MapX Mobile, and apart from a couple of major re-write’s moving from C++ to eVB to C# the software has lasted up to the present day.

New style mobile computing

Mobile computing hits the masses with i-Phone and Android

What has changed, however, is the process we follow to develop the software.  Adopting a combination user centred design and agile practices has been essential in minimising the time to value for our customers.  We now get the developers and customers together on a regular basis on “Customer Advisor Panels”, to work through and prioritise requirements.  At these sessions, which occur every 2 or 3 sprints, we are able to demonstrate production quality software that customers can take away and start using once their minimum threshold of capability has been reached.

 Looking forward I’m really excited about HTML5 as a platform for building truly cross-platform mobile applications whilst providing a rich UI that is specifically tuned to the device.  Watch this space…

My “Tool Box Theory”

Tool Box Theory

My tool box theory

When I got my first bicycle, I purchased an all-in-one spanner, two tyre levers and a puncture repair outfit.

When I got my first computer, it came with an operating system.

Later, I got a racing bike and purchased an adjustable spanner, some pliers and a screwdriver. 

Later, I bought a basic spreadsheet, word processor and a few games, which I played for hours.

Then I turned 16 and purchased a Lambretta GT200, so needed a few more tools: I found out why I needed circlip pliers, some ring spanners and some open ended spanners.  For Christmas that year, I received some box spanners and a tool box, for the first time.

Then I upgraded to a bigger computer, which came with my first copy of MS Office.

Seeing the wisdom in four wheels, I went on to purchase my first car along with a workshop manual and a few more tools.  In those days, cars were fairly basic and a whittled down broom handle could function as a clutch alignment tool when taking an engine in and out.  My first experience with Car Garages involved getting MOT’s and the remedial work that accompanied them.  My car regularly broke down and I learned how to fix it by the roadside, carrying my toolbox in the boot of the car.

I saw that I should learn some basic programming, to help me to understand how these programmes (that I had been using) were put together, so purchased a copy of Visual Basic.

Then I got a good job and had far less time.  I could not afford a car breakdown and possible delay to arriving at a key meeting, so started asking my local garage to service the car at regular intervals.

Then I got a good job and had far less time.  At work we purchased adequate computers with Spreadsheets, Word Processors and Access.  Some people wrote simple programmes in Access that helped and, after a while, we found a supplier who made great programmes specifically for our Industry and geared to the solving the business problems my department addresses for our Customers.

Over the years, I have found a garage I can trust with simple questions like “Is it worth keeping the car for 2 more years or should I replace it?”  They advise me on costs and other aspects that I may not have considered as they have knowledge that I do not.  Recently, I spent £1,000 on the air conditioning system, allowing me to keep the car for two extra years and that balances against the depreciation that a new car would suffer over the same period (£10,000)…good advice and not untypical of my garage.

Over the years, our solution supplier has fully participated in our industry, gone to the events we go to, read the articles we read and embedded functionality into our solution required by Legislation, Codes of Practice and Best Practice in my domain.  We sometimes purchase extra modules, but work with our supplier to calculate the ROI before we place an order.  We trust this supplier.

My tool box evolves into a truly Symbiotic Relationship

I no longer own a Workshop manual and my tool box is not used except for the most simple of tasks – change a tyre, fill up with oil and so on. 

I no longer know how to write VB code, or create Programmes in Access and my PC is functional.  I use it to deliver my organisation’s products and services to our valued Customers.

If I had another make of car, I might use another garage.  My garage own specialist tools that I could not afford, nor would I want.  They certify their staff externally as capable of analysing what is wrong with my car and putting it right with genuine parts.  I trust my garage to help me keep the cost of owning a good car to the absolute minimum.

If I worked in another department or another industry, I might use another supplier.  My supplier saves me large sums of money in a truly symbiotic relationship.  They certify their staff, externally, as capable of executing their role and keep them in touch with my industry trends and changes.  I trust my supplier to help me keep the cost of owning a good system to the absolute minimum whilst showing a proven return on my investment.

The citizen of the Big Society…

The Citizen of the Big Society

  • Thinks that data should be freely available if any Government organisation paid for it once
  • Is willing to give their time to non-paid community work
  • Is willing to give to Charities of their personal choice
  • Wants to be able to work from Home, where this makes sense to them
  • Wants to be able to access all applications and data from all points at all times
  • Wants to blur the borders between Work and Personal life to suit them – this could be career enhancing (Taking personal time for extra work) or the other way around (keeping “in-touch” on Facebook/Twitter 24 hours a day)
  • Needs to be able to access services on-line 24 hours a day 365 days a year
  • Wants Configurable workflows for work so that they can tune the world to their way of thinking or their company’s way of thinking – it is no longer acceptable to be directed by rigid Codes of Practice
  • Wants to work with others in their peer group and local community to decide how Public services are provided
  • Sees their own opportunity to strengthen Society and local Communities, but worries that Public Sector spending cuts will undermine this potential evolution
  • Worries that the Mantra of “Do more with less” ultimately leads to Public Services being provided at a lower quality by charities … and yet feels that they do not want to be in the group that consume from Charities!
  • Worries like mad about the Society that their Children will step into as they leave full time education – Big Society or not, there needs to be paid jobs for all who want to work

And what does all that have to do with Confirm Software?  Version 10 will be launched at the end of October 2010 and will encompass many new features to start us off on the positive aspects of our journey into the “Big Society”.  Along with Confirm version 10 is a carefully crafted and unique array of products, solutions and services – Stratus, for example, bringing web maps to Citizen Service Portals created by Local Councils and tailored for local Communities; Spectrum – a cafeteria menu of tools to enable large Organisations to talk to large numbers of Customers and Citizens through the channels of their choice and many other cost saving software solutions beside: http://www.pbinsight.eu/uk/