Archive for the 'Central Government' Category

In the absence of knowledge, create rumours

A series of small cuts in each of the next four years

A series of small cuts in each of the next four years

Cuts are coming.  Chief Execs have made high level plans to cut 25% in real terms over the next four years of this parliament. 

Few, if any, of the plans will have details of exactly how they will be executed.  Everyone is awaiting the autumn announcement and most countries around the world will be doing the same thing.  Without knowledge of how cuts will be implemented, rumours have started. In response, some have taken action whilst others are in denial or ignoring rumours.

Amongst the rumours and actions, are groups of people whose actions are based on the belief that 25% immediate cuts are being asked for.  So, lets look at the maths.  Most plans are  based 2011/12 being the same cash amount for their Local Authority as this year – hence a small decrease in real terms.  That leaves 3 more years to achieve a 25% reduction.

Create your own rumour.  The same is happening throughout the world.

Create your own rumour. The same is happening throughout the world.

Simple maths shows that it is necessary to make between 5.5% and 6.75% cuts in each of the next three years after 2011/12, if inflation is between 2% and 3%. 

That doen’t sound quite so bad, but certain services will be ring fenced, needing increased funding in line with inflation whilst others will be judged “non-core” and be asked to work with huge cuts or become optional.  Who knows what we will pay to get into the Swimming Baths in future and do we really believe that potholes will be fixed so quickly and efficiently as they are today?

And what about compliance with legislation?  What about new or changed Codes of Practice?  What about Citizen increased expectations and those adverts on TV about “if it wasn’t your fault you may be entitled to compensation: no fee”.

My rumour is that we will evolve into the new state: lower services in some respects and possibly some services and jobs transferred to the Private sector.  But the big point is that people will get creative and achieve these cuts using peer level collaborations of the most ingenious sort.

Achilles provide clues to UK Government cost savings

I recall in the film “Troy” that Achilles replies to the messenger boy who summons him to fight the Thessalonian Giant “…that is why no-one will remember your name”.  This leads me to think of our new Blue-with-yellow-stripes Government where two young Political leaders might well be fighting a giant financial problem… in a brand new way … and hope that people will remember their names.

By sprinting towards the Thessalonian Giant at full speed and using a side step a “dodge-jump-twist-stab” all in one motion, Achilles achieves the almost impossible, without fear.  I am looking for the new tactic to emerge from the emergency Budget and the early clue that £6bn of Public Sector Spending cuts WILL be an integral part of that emergency budget, planned for 50 days after David Cameron’s appointment.

At the Annual HAUC in Cardiff this week, I heard much talk about Partnering as a possible new tactic in achieving Public Sector spending cuts.  That was from Conference speakers.

I also heard from some of the 30 Confirm user organisations that were attendees at this annual conference (next year in Glasgow) who feel that they have huge internal savings that can be achieved by putting Mobile Computing in the hands of Street Works Inspectors.  The also saw revenue increases by implementing “Dashboards”, which might alert them of Street Works Notices requiring action and thus providing a more efficient service.  Some thought that providing on-line access to their bank of Contractors would allow the whole value chain to share one IT system and that efficiency savings would ensue.

What I did not hear about was the idea that large hidden cost savings might be found by sharing one system between several departments: a sort of internal partnering, or internal shared services.  The costs savings from a single interface to each of the big four corporate systems (Finance, CRM, GIS and Gazetteer) might save a single organisation up to £250k capital costs and £50k per year.  I did not hear much about moving to an OnDemand application rather than an On-Premise software system…where costs can be put into revenue streams rather than Capex plus revenue and I am guessing this is because the IT FM Contracts generally do not allows for reduced IT charges where departmental systems are outsourced into the Cloud. 

Savings will be made and time will tell what ways Councils will implement the cost savings.  Perhaps, as happened in the film Troy, we will feel delighted as our new Achilles slays the giant deficit.

Here’s to new and elegant “side steps”.  Watch your heels, David and Nick!

Seventh Heaven: Maintain services standards with greatly reduced costs

I have been looking at what might afford the best chance of actually reducing costs to UK Local Authorities in that period of austerity we expect post-election.  Some might even “have a go” pre-election if they can use existing IT Investments; therein lies my first idea:

Make most use of the systems you already own.  Confirm covers ten “departments” but not one of our Customers uses it in all ten.  Quite a few use it in 6, 7 or 8 and less than a handful use it in only one.  So extending it to other departments might cost nothing and offer the chance to stop paying support on those other systems.  It is quite high up on most IT Directors’ lists – reduce the total number of IT systems and if, like Confirm, there are great Corporate System Interfaces already in place, then hidden savings occur and need to be counted in reporting total savings!  (2 for the price of one?)

My second idea is about the need to comply with Legislation and Code of Practice whilst meeting service standards (and sometime to help the avoidance of incorrect or spurious liability claims).  In addition to meeting these requirements, Councils need to be sure that they can continue to meet ever-changing codes and laws.  Looking for hard evidence of this capability, of standing mechanisms that will not go away and are supported by staff structures that are sustainable.

As rare as Hens' teeth, perhaps as valuable as Gold teeth?

As rare as Hens' teeth, perhaps as valuable as Gold teeth?

My third is all about data.  Rubbish data is often the start point of a project to implement a new system, sometimes from disparate legacy systems and the cleansing and rationalisation of such data is essential…but who has the tools and the time.  Horizontal systems and Council staff with the expertise to use then are as rare as Hens’ teeth so can the supplier come up with the goods, experts and desire?  Look for evidence, see demos, ask reference sites.  The capability is as valuable as Gold teeth, especially if it is coupled with mechanisms to deal with ongoing asset data that is refreshed at intervals and asset data that starts off incomplete.

My fourth idea is about user democracy: What mechanisms exsit to get user ideas for software enhancements into the software.  A system will prevail over many years where user democracy is high more often than where it is “low to non-existent”.

The fifth idea is about software for mobile  workers that maps onto their role and the data needs within the host system workflows.  This is something that I have written about at length so I will not write more about it here save to say that Mobile hardware with a generic “something” (GIS or form based tool) is poor compared to specifically designed software that is Mobile Mapping enabled, capable of taking or showing linked photographs and files, that is GIS enabled, is tailored to the role requirement AND finally is linked to workflows/rules within the system that it is sending data to!

Seven ideas for a reducing the cost of a well maintained Street Scene

Seven ideas for a reducing the cost of a well maintained Street Scene

My next, the sixth, is about linking with Corporate systems, whether frontline or back-office.  Links should be using industry standard methods and standards so that the supply-side cannot hold its customers to ransom now or at any point in the future.  They should also add value by reducing cost, as well as paying their cost back within 18 months.  (Interfaces can be expensive, so this is a great acid test!)

Finally, my seventh is all about Citizen portals that perform any of the tasks relevant.  Citizens may have to report service requests, asset defects, incidents or they may wish to see how services are delivered or enquire after standards of service delivery achieved.

In my 20 years working with Confirm, if all seven are met or even if most are met, money is saved in huge amounts and from many aspects.  The principles are sound and part of a successful project.  There are other parts such as people management and “staff with talent”, but I am not so sure I can help there.

Invisible but efficient, please

Maintenance of Municipal assets is important: sometimes for function and sometimes for beauty

Maintenance of Municipal assets is important: sometimes for function and sometimes for beauty

Street based roads and municipal services don’t just happen, but Citizens want that to be the case.

My time working for a London Borough taught me that Citizens are quick to take great services for granted and to criticise – often “generously”.  The fact is that we do want clean streets but do not want to see people cleaning them, we do want great road surfaces but don’t want delays from roadworks and we do want green spaces to be beautiful but do not want grass cutting machines spoiling our Sunday stroll or child’s football match.

What do you remember about that remarkable place?  Was it the lack of litter, the smooth roads, the pavements that you could roller blade along, the cycle lanes off of the roadway?  I doubt it!  The things we remember are the good times, the pictures we take, the meals we had and it all comes across that invisible efficient Municipal background.

We would all be quick to criticise, but when did we last send a leeter complimenting our local council for things we did not notice?

We would all be quick to criticise, but when did we last send a letter complimenting our local council for things we did not notice?

With my job, I do notice municipal efficiency wherever it happens, but I also notice that others do not notice.  So every day I turn up with unswerving confidence for the importance of what I do – help Government departments provide that efficient and invisible service that creates experiences, memories and a street scene vista that is only treasured when it is no longer there.

I get confidence knowing that Confirm does for this critical part of our lives what Marks & Spencer did when they connected the Suppliers with their computer system, and the computer system with the shopper.  Nowadays, in all retail outlets, a dress is purchased and the stock holding is updated and the supplier receives a controlled order for another one.  In every Confirm user Government department or Municipal department, a citizen notices a pothole, reports it and a repair is ordered, the ticket is electronically issued over the airwaves and the team that has to fix it can make safe the existing low impact task and go straight to thathigh impact event or pothole so that they are, indeed, efficient and mainly invisible.  An inspector can take the post works inspection in their stride, without even returning to the office and reports go to the major stakeholders without anyone “pressing a key”.

Connecting the Stakeholders in the value chain was the largest leap ever made with software for Street Services and Mobile software is the most sought-after element of any operational system in any department.  IBM seem to be creating the ideal advertising campaign for Confirm – smarter cities indeed!

Jyvaskyla: an example of invisible efficiency.  There are many in the UK such as Derbyshire, Liverpool, Moray and many, many more.

Jyvaskyla: an example of invisible efficiency. There are many in the UK such as Derbyshire, Liverpool, Moray and many, many more.

So, on a recent trip (it happened to be Jyvaskyla in Finland), I noticed the municipal workers come out the morning after heavy rain to clear up, unlike the rest of my family.  We all noticed the sculptures in the parks of the “City of Light”, along with the people skating because there was no snow and the old people using ski-poles to help them walk.  Only I noticed that the pavements were spectacular as I cycled around with my youngest son, yet I never noticed anyone fixing a pothole.  Then, on a visit soon after to Derbyshire, I noticed another wonderful place, this time managed by Confirm.  During my business trip to Matlock in Derbyshire, I wondered how many families just like mine went home with similar memories of a great place in our country and just how many wonderful places there are in the UK.  Moray, West Lothian, Liverpool, Haringey, the Public Housing green spaces in Northern Ireland and hundreds more.

Making an invisible but efficient difference to peoples’ lives, all day, every day, Confirm Software.  Where’s beautiful in the UK?  Answers by email to dominic.mcneillis@pb.com

From St Fagos to Holy Grail

Nearest thing to St Fagos I could find

Nearest thing to St Fagos I could find

The Total Place pilots showed that Innovation is not only possible in the Public Sector, but also that passionate enthusiasts abound in Local Government life.

With a desire to engage the multitude of stakeholders involved with citizens to ferret out duplication of effort, it was self-apparent that connecting all of the organisations and departments that provide “related” citizen services was mandatory. Total Place was an opportunity to address some hitherto untouchable ideas.

The dark cloud of Turkeys voting for Christmas is the worry that often kept my department, in the 1970’s, from looking for efficiency improvements in certain areas of government life.

Holy grail of tomorrow?

Holy grail of tomorrow?

Listening to Peter Bole from Kent County Council at Intellect’s meeting in Russell Square on 23rd February certainly put a stake in the ground for moving into these hitherto untouchable areas.  What an inspiring story and a great talk.  I sense the worry of redundancies as multiple organisations decide that their efforts are overlapping, duplicating and often competing.

Beyond the Total Place pilots lies that paradox: we can identify waste, duplication, overlap and see the potential for step changes in efficiencies, 20%+, but it will put people out of work as the only way to tie up multiple agencies is with intelligent, multi-agency, shared and distributed IT Systems.  Putting the Citizen at the centre of any solution will indicate that distributed IT systems should be a part of the answer.

Will the “St Fagos” of yesteryear evolve into a “Holy Grail” of this year?  Or will the enthusiasm of the Total Place Pilots fade as post election politics re-brands this initiative and delays realisation of the savings for another 2-3 years?

Today’s challenge of 20% savings in IT from Government is filling some with enthusiasm and such enthusiasm is hard to deny.  It now has a momentum of its own.   

For those with an initiative in their heart and the Holy Grail burned into the back of their retina, work can be fun and good for citizens and good for the public purse.

If you are wondering who or what is St Fagos, please google it…more polite that way, methinks.  The mixing of metaphors is bad enough!

If you would like to know more about Total Place: 

http://www.localleadership.gov.uk/totalplace/news/total-place-in-the-news-march/

The Draft Infrastructure Assets Code: what action are you taking?

As the final documents are released, what will you be doing to implement and over what timescale?

As the final documents are released, what will you be doing to implement and over what timescale?

I was reviewing the CIPFA draft code again this weekend and wondered what those in Local Government are doing and/or expecting.  For my part, being somewhat involved with Confirm software, I am interested to know what might be going through the minds of Highways, Lighting, Structures and PMS Engineers as the first “Final documents” come out in the early months of 2010.

HM Treasury has set a timetable for a gradual transition to reporting on this basis, started with limited, unaudited data submissions for 2009/10, building up to a full audited dry run in 2011/12 and the withdrawal of historic cost based reporting from 2012/13.  Is that a timetable you are working to or, with such pressure on spending levels over the next 18 months, is it realistic to assume that you will be able to comply?

If you have a view, if you have a plan, what are the next steps … will you be attending any conferences or the next round of HAMFIG presentations announced last week?

It all makes for interesting times, but for some it may be extra workload with decreasing staff numbers.  The idea from one speaker at the 6th Highways Annual Conference in London last week seems to resonate with me: “…hold back on Capital projects as there is no point building new infrastructure if you do not have the resources and time to maintain what we have…” to paraphrase what was said.

 All materials to support implementation of the Code will be available at  www.cipfa.org.uk/pt/infrastructure

Your place or mine?

The topic of where software resides is creating a new choice: “your place or mine”.

Software has mainly been installed on a Customer’s own IT Infrastructure and I will refer to this as “on-premise”.  A new choice is emerging where software is available to use from a Supplier’s IT infrastructure and I will refer to this as “on-demand”, a term covering many options including “SaaS” (Software as a Service), “Hosted” and “over-the-net-in-a-browser”.
A question worth addressing at any time or just when your system is up for replacement?

A question worth addressing at any time or just when your system is up for replacement?

With the on-demand option, vendors might use phrases such as “there is no software, it is a service” and “you need to think differently, because there is no software any more”.  I think that there is, indeed, software; it is just provided in a more cost efficient model and licenced to you via a different style of contract.

Technicalities aside, what are the key issues that potential purchasers should think about if SaaS or on-demand is offered?  There are four groups of questions that must be considered and a few that might be considered:

  1. Suitability
  2. Absolute cost
  3. Availability
  4. Security

SUITABILITY

  • Don’t be distracted by the choice of on-demnd or on-premise UNTIL you have established that the software meets your business needs

ABSOLUTE COST

  • Compare all costs over a number of years
  • Look at the internal costs you might now NOT have to pay, which might include costs of IT support staff, hardware; IT departmental charges; third party software; version upgrade costs (can be up to £30k+ per year in many organisations using FM suppliers instead of in-house IT staff); reduced System administrator costs (as you no longer have 100 PCs to upgrade) and many more
  • Look at any hidden costs, such as a Departmental charge NOT reducing because of internal “rules” and extra interfacing costs
  • Include the commissioning costs if this is relevant (possibly low if an existing supplier is swapping the delivery method from on-premise to on-demand)

AVAILABILITY

  • How resilient is the proposition in terms of speed of access (e.g. when all staff are looking at the weather at 1pm on-line)
  • How is the data backed up, how often and where are backup stored?
  • How are local Maps, Local Printing and Local Corporate system interface dealt with?
  • Can people work from home, with their own variety of access bandwidths?
  • Does the Infrastructure supplier have one or many sites, where are they and how are significant incidents (floods, bombs etc) going to affect your system?
  • Will the Infrastructure supplier go bust (if this happens, you will not expect it, so best ask) and what happens that day to your system
  • How do Home workers access the system from home PCs – or is it best that this is a big NO
  • How would Field Workers upload and download data to mobile devices and what about the ones who need to do so wirelessly
  • and so on…

SECURITY

  • Where is the data stored?
  • Can ex-employees with a grudge trash the data?
  • It may matter to your organisation where the data is stored.  Find out.
  • What are the points at which the data is in the public domain, if any?
If you choose "On-Demand", choose it.

If you choose "On-Demand", choose it.

Naturally, the list of questions could go on a long time.  If I was a purchaser, being offered on-demand and on-premise, here is how I might think:

> Let’s make sure that I have evaluated this software as my best option BEFORE addressing my attention to this question (an old sales trick when getting no commitment to buy is to offer an alternative question that is a version of “so, if you did choose to buy it…which I know you have not yet done…, would you choose red or green?”)

> If this is my chosen software, then, is it cheaper to have on-demand over 1, 5 and 10 years for ME taking MY organisation’s way of counting costs to ME in MY role in MY department (if not stop right now)

> Now I am considering on-demand, how available is it compared to on-premise and what is the evidence to support that (or ask for I will insist on a trial of sorts)

> Now that I am considering on-demand and I know it is as available as on-premise (or better than on-premise), how will it interface to the systems and devices that are part of my requirement

> Now that I am OK with it technically, what data security rules should I consider and what evidence do I need (this one is pretty straightforward)

> How will the supplier develop the software’s capabilities for my vertical solution compared to how best of breed on-premise solutions are developed and what is the evidence? (I need proof that this makes financial sense to my supplier or they will either fail to develop the system as my needs change over time or go out of business)

With so many people offering on-demand as an alternative to on-premise, the need for a mutually beneficial relationship remains as does the need for me to be offered the choice: your place or mine!

What if you could predict when your assets will fail?

Being able to predict failure patterns of street assets may significantly reduce the cost of maintenance

Being able to predict failure patterns of street assets may significantly reduce the cost of maintenance

If you manage public assets, some feel that you are fundamentally responsible for providing a service to citizens around the street scene, which itself partially defines the society in which they live. Your professional life may revolve around the maintenance of a sub set of street scene assets and belonging to a professional organisation may be an important part of how you acquire the knowledge that helps you to optimise effective maintenance within the available funds.

Someone in your team is publicly accountable and will have to provide feedback to stakeholders in the “Value Chain” and best practice may indicate a change in maintenance practice. Have we already seen one or two examples of such changes and are we about to witness others?

In the pursuit of providing a principle road network, Inspectors walked along the road and pavements noting down road defects. Where a road was defective over a wide area, treatments were recommended and, if the budget was available, work carried out. Then came the high speed survey machines and a new approach to the science of Pavement Management based on more data, much more data. Instead of acting mainly reactively, Highways Managers started to try to predict when a road would fail, having noticed that sums needed to bring roads back to their design standard suddenly increased (below a certain level of deterioration) with time.

The sequence of activities associated with this style of maintenance is judged by the industry to be lower cost and might be applicable in other Street Scene situations. The sequence is:

1. Inventory Definition

2. Pavement Inspection

3. Condition Assessment

4. Condition Prediction

5. Condition Analysis

6. Work Planning

UKPMS is kept up to date by the industry for the industry

UKPMS is kept up to date by the industry for the industry

Agreed algorithms to predict deterioration of roads are used by all Government Agencies in the UK that are the Custodians of Public Roads and the practice is common throughout the world with tailored algorithms to suits the political and physical climate in each region.

Can this principle be applied to other street scene assets or services? Would it provide a better return on our long term public spend or provide better services at a lower cost (the battle cry of UK Government today). Did it, indeed, provide an improvement over the previous position before UKPMS and, if so, how and why?

High speed machines travel at 60mph along pre-defined routes Roads (1) and collect data (2) which is processed and fed into software (3) which records Condition Assessments as set out in the UKPMS “code of practice” and time/date stamps them. Software is then used with the agreed algorithms to predict how the condition of the road will change over time (4) so that an analysis (5) of the overall road network condition can be made in preparation to be tested against available funds in order to proposed optimised treatments ahead of work planning (6).

The pre-requisites of 1-6 are that there is a standard way of doing each step and that enough reliable data has been collected over the years to enable robust predictions to be made, whilst data about the cost of treatment options is kept current for stages 5 and 6 particularly. It is also likely that the optimised treatment dependent upon available funds will show a shortfall, indicating the need for a further condition prediction cycle where the eventual deterioration of the road will render is unusable….leading in turn to a cycle of seeking additional funds to eventually minimise the spend on maintenance over the long term. This may be incompatible with short term Political aims, of course.

So, if we are happy that this method might be transferable to other public assets/public services, we need to ask the question “has the underlying science been done and enough data been collected?” An example is Street Lighting, where the cost of Lamp replacement to a 30m high column on a busy road junction is very high and to smaller ones is still relatively high. To this date, most Custodians of this invaluable public asset have used “Bulk Lamp change” as the most cost effective way of ensuring that our streets are lit to an appropriate level. The 2009 Street Lighting Engineer’s annual conference had quite a few papers presented on topics around “remote sensors”, some proposing that a revolution in cost reduction might be available through their use. Street Lighting Engineers also have to accurately report the energy usage to the energy supplier in the UK, according to an industry standard and these devices might be able to remotely control and vary the level of light, thus reducing the energy usage and provide a realistic “Return On Investment” (ROI) based on this characteristic alone. If they can also predict when a light is about to fail, does this mean that the cost of Lamp replacement will reduce? Bulk Lamp change was introduced for a reason and maybe there is not enough data around today to make that judgement.

I guess it might be appropriate to go through the 6 stage that defines PMS to see if one is happy with the ROI figures provided by the purveyors of the devices and software surrounding this science – and that it for Lighting Engineers to measure and “report back”. Time will tell.

What about Bridges? That is being done and we expect an update from the scientists collecting and examining the data via the County Surveyor Society (CSS) in April 2010.

Theatrical Street Scene at night in Belgium - saving taxpayers money?

Theatrical Street Scene at night in Belgium - saving taxpayers money?

How about our Parks, Green assets and sports areas? What about the Public Trees? And what about the Bins our refuse and recyclables are collected from?

Looking at the 8 types of Maintenance from last week’s post, I wonder what outsourced companies might agree with the Municipal Organisations of tomorrow and how the cost of public services will change with time. Will we create revolutions to reduce public spending or will we provide better and safer streets, where, perhaps, criminals are caught as they walk by Street Lamp Columns with retina scanners mounted at a vandal-proof height?

Will the street lights be dimmed at 9pm and raised at 11pm to signal that it is time to go home, as in a theatre – it is already happening in Belgium!

Do you manage assets or provide services?

Millau Bridge, Tarn Valley, Southern France

Millau Bridge, Tarn Valley, Southern France

Employees in Local, Regional and Central Government Agencies, their partners and a plethora of stakeholders turn up for work each day and do their part in the “Value Chain” of Public Infrastructure Maintenance.  Some inspect assets, others make difficult decisions about expenditure based on limited funds and resources.  Yet others are skilled tradespeople and craftspeople who actually do the jobs that repair, install or decommission assets.

Are these people experts in Maintenance Management?  Are the assets themselves actually important?  Or is the Service the thing of importance?

Looking at Refuse collection services, the publicly owned refuse bin is not that which one normally focuses on as an employee in a Municipal Cleansing and Waste work group; the service is what draws delivery staff attention – is it timely, effective, cost effective?

When we look at other assets, we might be drawn to other conclusions.  A Bridge Engineer will definitely focus their working efforts on the Condition of components of a Bridge in the context of failure of the whole Asset.  With catastrophic consequences, Bridge failure is the correct focus yet one may ask if all it does is provides a service, as part of a Highway…whose function is to facilitate the efficient movement of citizens between various buildings.  Some Bridges are destinations, with intrinsic beauty and statuesque appeal such as the Millau Bridge in Southern France or the Fehman Belt Bridge in the Baltic Sea.

Even beautiful assets have function, the ambition of the designer or commissioning body had the vision to make something with intrinsic beauty, adding a secondary function of making a statement about that part of the world, turning “it” into a destination or, more likely, providing function within the context of a beautiful area. 

...you affect the lives of citizens in a profound way

...you affect the lives of citizens in a profound way

Back to the people…Assets are key to providing services?  Perhaps.  If so, consider the process of maintaining the road.  It needs to be available in perpetuity, in the best condition that supports the transport requirements of the day and unavailable for the least amount of time.  People have developed science to predict the best time to do the least amount of work to keep the road available and this science can be flexed for differing budgets and differing desired road conditions (Pavement Management).  The people who carry out this “science” are called Pavement Engineers and they care about the asset; their managers and policy makers care about the service.  In consultation with “Government” about Public funds and sometimes with citizens (in a democracy) about desired quality, they set out the rules and parameters for the Engineers to conduct their Asset Maintenance Science.

Now to the staff involved in “event driven maintenance”.  There are many aspects of Street Based Asset Maintenance in which Events drive most of the remedial actions.  Examples include Graffiti removal, many types of property repair, Street Lamp replacements, clearing fly tipping, providing a Bulky Household collection, clearing a fallen tree…none of which would ever happen without their event…amusing thought, perhaps, clearing a fallen tree that isn’t there yet?  “Event Driven Maintenance” could be a topic in a University course and, indeed, tomes have been written about this aspect of Infrastructure Maintenance, but it is really all about providing a service to citizens so that they enjoy a great built environment.

Manage assets or provide services?  The TEAM has a profound effect on the lives of its citizens.

Manage assets or provide services? The TEAM has a profound effect on the lives of its citizens.

I went to one of the big Business Analyst firms the other day and the Director of Public Infrastructure and I mused about how most citizens hardly notice the well maintained Public assets that ARE Britain, or New Zealand, or Melbourne and so on.  Citizens visit other parts of the world and notice that Refuse in (perhaps) The Gambia is collected every month, when a large truck goes along the main streets and most refuse on the street is collected and thrown into the back of large trucks by intimidating crews; children are kept away and cars are parked off of the route whilst domestic refuse and unwanted items are put out into the now empty street.  You would not be asking for the Bin to be a different shape, which colour should be used for recyclables or whether it had an ID chip but you might be asking for weekly collections as a start point! 

So we are focused back on the service. 

My conclusions is that TEAMS provide services to citizens.  Within the team, Engineers and Scientists practise aspects of the appropriate Asset Maintenance Management techniques. Others within the team make decisions levels of service to balance public funds with citizen demands.

On a purely personal note, I observe that those involved in all aspects of Managing public assets and providing public services affect our lives much more than we usually think about…until we are confronted with very different levels of service or public assets that are clearly in a very different condition.  Oh, and by the way, the public would like to hardly notice your 24/7/365 efforts, but want to feel really good about where they live.

To answer my own question “Do you manage assets or provide services?”, I choose an answer with an added observation: Your team does both and, in so doing, you have a profound effect on all of the citizens you serve.

Will there be a case for IT Investment in the short term?

Data from the ONCWith Public Sector borrowing soaring, is it nevertheless still true that IT investment that actually saves money in total Return On Investment (ROI) will be in vogue during the next 18 months?  Have we been so used to the common sense approach of actually providing the same services for less (or better services for the same money) that the strong signals by both major Political parties that they are about to reduce public spending are being heard but not listened to?

Here are the stats from the Office for National Statistics (ONC).  The public sector showed a deficit on current budget of £11.3 billion in September 2009, compared with a deficit of £7.6 billion in September 2008.

More generally, the public sector recorded deficits between 1991/92 and 1997/98 before moving into surplus in 1998/99. Deficits have been recorded since 2002/03.

An alternative measure of the public sector fiscal position is public sector net borrowing. This additionally takes account of capital investment. In September 2009, there was net borrowing of £14.8 billion, which compares with borrowing of £8.7 billion in September 2008. The Budget forecast for 2009/10 is net borrowing of £175 billion.

Public sector net debt, expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), was 59 per cent at the end of September 2009 compared with 48.4 per cent at end of September 2008. Net debt was £824.8 billion at the end of September compared with £695.2 billion a year earlier.

Sobering numbers but will the focus on building services around the citizen prevail, as long as a provable ROI case can be documented ahead of major purchasing decisions…and then, of course, monitored?